SAT-011Approach & landing

Stabilized approach criteria

The operator-defined gates and conditions used to judge whether path, speed, configuration, thrust, and crew readiness support safe continuation.

4Focus areas
8FDM connections
4Deep briefs
12Reading links

What this profile covers

The operator-defined gates and conditions used to judge whether path, speed, configuration, thrust, and crew readiness support safe continuation.

Why it matters

Approach and landing concentrate configuration, weather, automation, runway, monitoring, and go-around decisions into a short period. For stabilized approach criteria, useful analysis connects the immediate event with exposure, defenses, recurrence, and the wider operating system rather than treating one observation as a final conclusion.

Topic familyApproach & landingFlight Operations
Family lens

Approach planning, path and energy control, landing contact, and runway-margin protection.

Understand the subject before interpreting a signal.

In plain language, this profile examines the operator-defined gates and conditions used to judge whether path, speed, configuration, thrust, and crew readiness support safe continuation.

stabilized approachapproach gatego aroundenergy
Evidence to combine

Build a multi-source picture

  • Multi-parameter approach and landing flight data
  • Weather, wind, runway, and procedure information
  • Crew reports and relevant ATC records
  • Operator criteria and aircraft-specific approved data
What flight data contributes

Timing, relationships, and recurrence

Relevant recorded context may include radio altitude, vertical speed, calibrated airspeed, pitch attitude, roll angle. Use validated mappings and examine signal relationships over the applicable flight phase.

Interpretation boundary

Do not turn an observation into a conclusion

A gate exceedance or touchdown value is a screening observation, not by itself a causal finding, handling judgement, maintenance determination, or universal definition.

Decision standard

Keep controlling material visible

Apply the current approved manuals, procedures, authority requirements, investigation evidence, and validated organizational definitions for any operational decision.

From a broad topic to a defensible safety review.

01

Define

State what stabilized approach criteria means for the aircraft, operation, authority, and organization in scope.

02

Verify

Confirm the provenance, quality, timing, units, completeness, and limitations of every data source used.

03

Describe

Reconstruct what happened and quantify relevant exposure before discussing causes or corrective action.

04

Corroborate

Compare flight data with reports, operational context, technical evidence, and authoritative source material.

05

Test barriers

Identify which preventive, recovery, and consequence-mitigation controls should have worked and how their performance can be measured.

06

Assure

Assign proportionate action and verify whether the control and safety performance improve without harmful unintended effects.

Questions before conclusions

  1. Q1

    How is stabilized approach criteria defined for the aircraft, operation, authority, and organization being reviewed?

  2. Q2

    Which precursors, recorded signals, reports, and external data would confirm the event and describe its context?

  3. Q3

    Which preventive, recovery, and consequence-reduction barriers should work, and where could they weaken?

  4. Q4

    What does recurrence, exposure, severity potential, or change over time show before choosing a safety action?

8 connected event profiles

These are terminology and family connections for exploration—not claims that FDM alone can determine the topic.

Go deeper into the closest ASIP research guides.

12 useful starting points

Original ASIP summaries lead to publisher pages. ASIP does not copy or host the reports.

No copied report filesSearch all related records →
U.S. National Transportation Safety BoardDirect title match

Safety Alert SA-077 — Stabilized Approaches Lead to Safe Landings

The NTSB alert highlights the need to establish and maintain a stabilized approach and to go around when an approach falls outside applicable criteria.

Open official source
Airbus Safety FirstDirect title match

Flying a Go-Around Managing Energy

Official Airbus Safety First material indexed for aviation safety. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Open official source
Flight Safety FoundationDirect title match

Go-Around Decision-Making and Execution Project — Final Report

The Flight Safety Foundation project examines go-around policy compliance, decision biases, operational pressures, and the risks that also need to be managed during go-around execution.

Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationDirect title match

SAFO 21006 — SAFO 21006, Boeing Model 757 and 767 Airplane Inadvertent Pilot Activation of Go-Around Mode

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for aviation safety. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationDirect title match

SAFO 15004 — SAFO 15004, Scenario-Based Go-Around Training

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationDirect title match

SAFO 10005 — Go-Around Callout and Immediate Response

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for aviation safety. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Open official source
Airbus Safety FirstDirect title match

Automatic NAV engagement at Go-around

Official Airbus Safety First material indexed for aviation safety. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Open official source
Airbus Safety FirstDirect title match

Go-around handling

Official Airbus Safety First material indexed for ground operations. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Open official source
Airbus Safety FirstDirect title match

Go-Arounds at Addis Ababa due VOR Reception Problems

Official Airbus Safety First material indexed for aviation safety. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Open official source
Airbus Safety FirstDirect title match

Introduction to the Soft Go-Around Function

Official Airbus Safety First material indexed for aviation safety. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Open official source
Airbus Safety FirstDirect title match

Non-Engagement of the Go-Around Modes in CLEAN Flaps Configuration

Official Airbus Safety First material indexed for maintenance. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Open official source
Airbus Safety FirstDirect title match

Preventing Tailstrike During Go-around Near the Ground

Official Airbus Safety First material indexed for ground operations. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Open official source
ICAO / CICTT

Common Taxonomy Team

International work on common aviation occurrence categories and definitions for consistent reporting and analysis.

Open reference
EASA

Safety Risk Management

European safety-risk process connecting data, safety issues, risk portfolios, priorities, and safety action.

Open reference
EASA

Annual programmes and reports

Annual safety reviews and risk portfolios used to identify key risk areas, safety issues, and emerging issues.

Open reference
EASA

European Plan for Aviation Safety 2025

A broad evidence-based portfolio showing the scale and connected nature of current aviation safety issues.

Open reference
SKYbrary

Operational issues index

A practical discovery index for operational safety subjects; official authority and manufacturer sources remain controlling where applicable.

Open reference